Nonetheless, dut to the decrease in the economic state of the country the increase in the wage had no effect on the populations’ economic level

Nonetheless, dut to the decrease in the economic state of the country the increase in the wage had no effect on the populations’ economic level

The voting rights however kept changing. The women were not allowed to vote by the 1920 constitution. These people were not considered important members of the Egyptian society. These people were property that was owned by men. In addition, there existed deplorable economic situation in the country. Unemployment, lack of opportunities, police lawlessness, bad health care system, overpopulation, congested highway and poor urban transport, nepotism and bribery in government agencies – Egypt suffered every one of these ailments as thirty years ago, and in 2011. The per capita income was low, wages are not enough even for 1st 10 days, many villages are still not connected to the electricity. The president Mubarak used his political position and authority to simply help his partners and simultaneously depressing the country progressively every single day (Soueif). There was clearly not fair elections in the united states, no representative government was formed – it consists of only the Mubarak’s followers, there was clearly no official opposition in the united states (Soueif).

Client says about us

Lisa, Buffalo

I’m fully satisfied with the essay you’ve written for me. I have got a excellent mark. Thanks.

Carl F., Albuquerque

As a working student, I don’t have enough time for doing all my difficult assignments. Luckily professionals at 123helpme.org can do it for me as soon as I need. Thank you!

Alden, Detroit

Met the deadline and delivered a quality paper. Thanks for a good job!

Jamal M

My feelings? All I’m able to say is that I’m totally impressed by the grade of my essay! I will recommend your essay service to all my friends at college! 🙂

Sharon F., New York

it really is worth applying this 123HelpMe.org site to order custom academic papers. I ordered lots of my papers here and all of them were written professionally! I did not even expect such a quality of writing!

The emergency law in Egypt was one of the worst state acts in Egypt during the pre-revolution period. The powers that had been provided to the police were extended such that the police treated the Egyptians with so much brutality. These people were used by the state to harass people. These people were ruthless. Many reports showed that these people were raping and sodomizing the citizens. There were torture chambers to deal with those who made any opposition to the state. Human rights were violated and the government had no provision to protect individuals. There was clearly indefinite imprisonment that was designed to suppress all the persons who intended to question the government. There was clearly no political right to assemble or form a movement that would enlighten individuals concerning their rights (Midant-Reynes 306).123helpme.me

The immediate issues that sparked the 2011 revolution were numerous. For instance, the emergency law that saw the police bears the capacity to torture and also abuse the Egyptian citizens. The police were shooting and torturing the citizens whose rights were not protected by the state and the constitution (Abdelrahman 294). The police were also corrupt such that they could not practice justice. They abused the rights of life, physical wellbeing by acts of sodomy and rape. Opposition groups including the Muslim brotherhood were mistreated and considered as danger to the security of this nation yet they were fighting because of their rights (El Mahdi and Marfleet 87).

After the 2011 Revolution

After the revolution in the year 2011, many changes were witnessed in Egypt. The Egyptioan authorities changed constitution 3 tymes, i.e. every year. Despite the fact that the country experienced some level of democracy (Bowman 25), the situation in the united states did dramatically changed. Indeed, there were areas of human rights that recognized considerable changes such as minorities, education, minimum wage, emergency law, elections, but despite the adoption of those rule country still do not move towards the democracy. Minority groups in the country could air their grievances and have their voice had unlike before, 2011 when only the majority could be heard. The population of the Egypt launched their eyes to the real face of Muslim Brotherhood party and the revolution empowered the minorities in different sectors. It helped them rise to positions of power, where they could contribute in national decisions and fulfill their constitutional rights (Social Watch).

The minimum wage of employees in Egypt was increased from what it was before the revolution. Before the revolution, employees in Egypt are it working for the government or the private sector were getting miserable pays (Abdelrahman 297). Nonetheless, dut to the decrease in the economic state of the country the increase in the wage had no effect on the populations’ economic level. If before the minimum wage was enough only for 10 days, after the revolution this wage was not sometimes enough for a week (“Egypt”).

Emergency law was abolished. That is; the traits that characterized the emergency law stopped functioning. The powers that police officers previously possessed were reduced, giving individuals access to human rights. The freedom of police stayed, but decreased in comparison to the situation before the revolution. Nonetheless, the great level of violence on the streets was even increase and the police officers were often the part of this violence. In addition, the case of violence contrary to the journalists became more frequent.

FREE EXTRAS:

  • FREE plagiarism report (on request)

  • FREE revision (within 2 days)

  • FREE title page

  • FREE bibliography

  • FREE outline (on request)

  • FREE e-mail delivery

  • FREE formatting

WE GUARANTEE:

  • Quality research and writing

  • 24/7/365 Live support

  • MA, BA, and PhD degree writers

  • 100% Confidentiality

  • No hidden charges

  • Never resold works

  • Papers written from scratch

PAPER FEATURES:

  • 12 pt. Instances New Roman

  • Double-spaced/Single-spaced papers

  • 300 words/page

  • 1 inch margins

  • Any citation style

  • Up-to-date sources only

  • Fully referenced papers

Elections, experienced a considerable change in these people were these people were conducted after 2011. There was clearly public mobilization to encourage visitors to participate in the voting process (Hatem 43). The adoption of new constitution changed the election system, but failed to provide the basic human rights. The freedom of branches of power, the military trials, transparency and the freedom of justice system are not provided in the new constitution, which can be the violation both the human being rights and the basic rules of the democracy. Thus, here, the situation did not changed.

After June 30th till Now

Nowadays despite the temporary improvement, Egypt is turning back once again to the state before the revolution. New authorities decided that military powers are the best way to rule country and keep the democracy inside the country. Thus, the power of police and army is growing every single day, which can result in new revolution. Since the quantity of tourists has declined, vacancies even fewer – lost their jobs thousands of Egyptians working in the tourism business. Therefore, the county is economically instable and the wages and the wages level in the country is still really low. Speaking of women. If women have been sexually harassed and abused before the revolution, after it the gang rape and domestic violence became more frequent. In the provinces, the law banned female circumcision again became a commonplace, which can be the violation of human right (Hellyer).

Mubarak liberation from prison, the removal of restrictions on the political activities of the functionaries of the old regime, a return to tradition, according to which the country’s leader may very well be the head and representative of the army, the prohibition of religious parties, a unicameral parliament – all this testifies to the fact that Egypt after three years revolution returns to the dictatorship, strongly reminiscent of the reign of the late Mubarak. With regards to liberalization, the situation had improved for the religion (El-Faizy). This is evidenced by the attempt to cut off non-secular political regime supporters to participate in government (primarily, preventing them to parliament).

  • Strugling with your essay?
  • Ask professionals to help you!

Hardest hit by these problems experience the Egyptian poor people. In previous times, they survived by loved ones working in the Gulf countries and Libya, state or international aid and relatively low unemployment level (in comparison to what is now).https://123helpme.me/ Also, due to government subsidies ( through which the bread was worth 1 cent per loaf, fuel – not as much as 20 cents per liter). Today, overseas transfers are dramatically reduced, and youth unemployment has reached 25%. Based subsidies (fuel, bread, gas) became difficult to allocate, given that they represent more than 20 % of the budget at a budget deficit of 12-13 % of GDP (Hellyer).

Nonetheless, this is the democracy. With Egyptian characteristics, but nevertheless a democracy. The current regime is much more democratic than Mubarak’s one. Under Mubarak’s rule everything was decided by the secret service, every citizen was under suspicion. A person might be put into a prison because of the wrong word or for inappropriate photos. Mubarak’s regime failed to recognize civil rights, human being rights. Nowadays, despite the country again is moving towards the military regime, the population reached the right to vote, to convey their thoughts and obtained a partial freedom.

You can on this or any other topic at 123HelpMe.org. Don’t waste your time, order now!

Order Essay using this Title Plagiarism Free Prices From only 12,99$/page

Background

It is estimated that the United States has more prisoners than any other country in the world (Gaines & Miller, 2006). Nonetheless, whilst the prisoners return to the society after serving their prison terms, a significant percent of this released either repeat similar offends, for which these people were jailed, or commit the newest crimes (Gaes, Camp, Nelson, & Saylor, 2004). It really is evident that, though the quantity of the prisoner rehabilitation programs in both public and private prisons have succeeded in rehabilitating and educating offenders, a significant number of prisons are yet to achieve tangible results. Therefore, usually, both types act as the holding facilities for prisoners waiting for their jail term to end.

The initial aim is to protect the public against any criminal acts that can cause any harm or injury (Peak, 2012). Therefore, the prisons should not only act as the punitive institutions but also integrate educative, rehabilitative, and re-entry programs that the released prisoners do not repeat their crimes again. In essence, both private and public prisons should eliminate the persistent cycle of committing the crimes by offenders, their arrest, sentencing, release, and repeating the process.

A significant number of prisons in america are private institutions that operate on the behalf of the department of corrections. Though these prisons are private business entities, they are subject to oversight by the departments of justice and corrections (Gaines & Miller, 2006). The development of rehabilitation programs in private prisons is business-oriented since the companies that own private prisons are more concerned with the profit instead of the prisoner rehabilitation. The private prisons include Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) and Wackenhut Corrections Corporation (WCC), which can accommodate over 85,000 prisoners (Gaines & Miller, 2006).

On the one hand, the duty of the public prisons is to ensure the due rehabilitative process through the integration of various programs that address the unique needs of each prisoner. Particularly, public prisons have placed an emphasis on the factors that motivate the inmates to commit crimes. These programs feature different  psychosocial tests and exercises, educational programs and development of technical skills that can enable the prisoners acquire competitive skills to be used once they are released. Since public prisons certainly are a subject to examination and scrutiny by the public and various vested institutions in terms of the prisoners’ well-being, they provide the rehabilitation process, procedures, and treatment of prisoners relative to the official policies and standards.

Factors that Influence Rehabilitation of Prisoners

Accountability is the key element in the public prisons since there are more controls that ensure that the rehabilitation of the inmates is prioritized (Gaes et al., 2004). In essence, these controls which can be under public purview are intended as a strategic measure that seeks to protect the prisoner’s rights and provide rehabilitation. In addition, the scrutiny subjected to public prisons by various watchdogs including the department of justice, human rights groups, and different correctional oversight bodies ensure that the prisoners are not mistreated. In such a manner, all prisoners are treated relative to the constitutional provisions; their rights can not be violated by their punitive sentence (Featherman, Thornton, & Correnti, 2001).

On the other hand, private prisons are business entities that stand to benefit from the increased number of prisoners. Private prisons receive compensation from the state, in order to cover their operational costs; therefore, in these businesslike model, prisoners are considered a profit-making product. Therefore, while a number of private prisons have implemented comprehensive programs that the prisoners are given with the holistic rehabilitation, most of them have not dedicated to the effective rehabilitation initiatives (Featherman et al., 2001). The rehabilitation of prisoners in private prisons is perceived as a poor business decision. Since the inmates are compared to the customers in mainstream businesses, rehabilitation means getting rid of the customer; consequently, the business is endangered.

The integration of the profit concept in the rehabilitation of prisoners in the private prisons limits the extent, to which the inmates are educated and rehabilitated, in order to be ready to re-entry into the society (Gaes et al., 2004). The resources that can rehabilitate inmates are diverted to job creation and stimulation of local economies, within which the private prisons are found. Consequently, private prisons act as the holding institutions that benefit from the increased recidivism rates. Therefore, as opposed to concentrating on the prison programs that can help the released prisoners not to return to the prison, companies that run and own private prisons are more concerned with creating better and bigger prison facilities that can hold larger numbers of the inmates. It makes a business sense for such private prisons to focus on the expansion as opposed to rehabilitation.

The rehabilitation of prisoners is an ongoing process that is conducted within and beyond your prison once the inmate is released (Phelps, 2011). Therefore, the rehabilitation costs continue being incurred through external programs that the released prisoners integrate into society and are provided with the continued support to prevent them from recidivism. Since these costs of enforcing both internal and external programs are significant, private prisons usually give attention to enforcing only the internal programs. Meanwhile, public prisons implement both internal and external rehabilitation programs in partnership with the community-based groups. This strategy develop social structures and foundation, within which the released prisoners can re-integrate into society and stay provided with job opportunities, including facilitation of guidance and counselling programs that help them cope and adapt to the environment beyond your prison (Phelps, 2011).

Public prisons have the due process since the inmate rehabilitation programs are systematic and are implemented after comprehensive report on the issues that influence distinct criminal behavior, attitudes, and motivators. In addition, social and economic factors that contribute towards criminal behavior are integrated as a part of the rehabilitation program with the aim of enabling the inmates to cope with similar challenges without resorting to crime. The institutional structures of public prisons make them perfect for the rehabilitation of prisons because they are overseen by the federal and state justice systems. In essence, these oversight bodies help in the development of rehabilitation strategies, rules, and regulations including different incarceration policies for the rehabilitation of prisoners (Gaines & Miller, 2006).

Client says about us

Sofia, Calgary

One of the best writing services. All papers were delivered on time and were flawless.

Alden, Detroit

Met the deadline and delivered a quality paper. Thanks for a good job!

Sharon F., New York

it really is worth applying this 123HelpMe.org site to order custom academic papers. I ordered lots of my papers here and all of them were written professionally! I did not even expect such a quality of writing!

Khalid, Dubai

All I can say is that I am very impressed. My writer completed an order on time and followed every single instruction I gave! You have done a great job guys, many thanks!

Thea T., Salt Lake City

There is an awesome staff at your custom essay writing company. I feel confident that any time I need a paper to be written, you’ll be able to accommodate me and I will get a great result for my money. You are true professionals who know how to run their business very well!

Though the management and operational procedures of public and private prisons have distinct differences, the two prison systems are equally accountable to the public. Nonetheless, private prisons are product-oriented ones; the grade of their rehabilitation procedures focuses more on the services being delivered rather than the impacts of such services on the inmate. Effective rehabilitation of prisoners requires the prison programs to influence the behavior and attitudes of prisoners.

The federal and state governments may demand private prisons to meet up with the designed standards and requirements in the incorporated prisoner rehabilitation programs. Since these programs may be a conditional requirement for approval, the private prisons may implement such programs with the aim of pretending to meet up with all the expectations (Gaes et al., 2004). Nonetheless, the business enterprise aspect of the private prison will always ensure that the rehabilitation program are implemented as a procedural requirement yet not as a system to cause changes in the behavior of the inmates.

The operational distinction between the public and private prisons is illustrated by their goals in terms of rehabilitation. Since private prisons are an extension of the prison system, they are mandated to observe statutory requirements, laws, and standards of practice with initial aim of enhancing and safeguarding the well-being of the inmates. Evidently, there are significant managerial differences between the  private and public prisons that can be attributed to the accessibility of resources (Featherman et al., 2001). The prison rehabilitation programs require money and allocation of qualified humanpower in order to ensure that the programs are delivered professionally and in accordance with the expected standards. The challenge for public prisons is the inadequate financing as a results of constrained budgetary allocations by the federal and state governments.

Policy Implications and Funding

Contrary to the private prisons that have adequate resources, public prisons face the challenge of financing which includes caused it to be difficult to implement the rehabilitation programs for prisoners. This situation has caused the ineffectiveness of the rehabilitation strategies that, in turn, have led to the increased rates of recidivism. Since public prisons are underfunded, they are unable to implement effective approaches and strategies for the management of prisoners (Blakely, 2007). In addition, the increased prison populations have caused congestion in prisons and escalation of the inmate behavior and attitudes. Also, the prison staff including the guards are overstretched and unable to manage various challenges of the prisons effectively. These challenges have caused public prisons to be unable in enforcing rehabilitative procedures.

Essentially, the prison system faces a crisis that requires comprehensive reform beginning at the policy development level. Nonetheless, the reform initiatives have faced various challenges including the altered public perception regarding the American penal system, the economic downturn, and changing political environments (Gaes et al., 2004). The overcrowding in prisons has allowed prisoners to interact freely with the minor offenders who are encouraged to commit grave crimes when released.

In addition, the lack of effective management and allocation of resources in public prisons have led to the establishment of criminal companies and gangs within the facilities, whose influence expands far beyond the prison walls. These issues make modern prisons institution where offenders learn new criminal behavior and develop skills and attitudes that influence their actions once released. The objective of rehabilitation public prisons is to prevent future crimes; nonetheless, the commonplace conditions in the American public prisons have only contributed towards escalating the future crime rates given the high rates of recidivism which can be recorded today (Featherman et al., 2001).

Meanwhile, private prisons have adequate resources at their disposal because they are run as the business entities which can be assessed on the basis of their performance in rehabilitating and accommodating the inmates, in addition to preventing the development of criminal companies or gangs within their facilities. Dramatically, private prisons can hire enough humanpower in order to manage all the needs of prisoners. In addition, the prison workers such as guards have increasingly flexible working hours including varied benefits and bonuses including the overtime payment (Gaes et al., 2004).

Our Benefits

  • Free revision within 2 days
  • 3 hrs Min for Order Delivery
  • 100% Certified Writers
  • 24/7 Customer Support

These facts motivate the vigilance on the list of prison staff that ensures that the inmates are kept in check. The rehabilitation programs in private prisons are well-funded and equipped even though the outcomes of such programs vary according to their delivery and initial objectives of the program managers. the private prisons have better chances of accessing resources as compared to the public prisons gives them the ability to manage their programs effectively. In addition, they can even save yourself since the state and federal government compensate because of their operational costs (Gaes et al., 2004).

The issues that emerge in the rehabilitation of prisoners in the private prisons include the issues regarding the safety, privacy, and psychological well-being of the inmates in such prisons. There have been reported various instances of the guards in private prisons being accused of benefiting from the inmates or abusing them including juvenile individuals. Since the guards are not state or federal government employees, they are not bound by the ethical or regulatory provisions imposed in the public prisons. Therefore, the management of prison staff in private prisons is essential in preventing any abuse incidents. Nonetheless, some of the guards which can be hired in such prisons may not be an easy task to control; consequently, such prisoner abuse cases often result in the prison riots.

The abuse of prisoners does not amount to the rehabilitative procedures but contributes to the escalation of existing criminal behavior problems or development of the newest criminal tendencies. Prisoner rehabilitation in the private prisons may take extreme measures with the aim of deterring the other inmates from repeating behavior that is considered unacceptable. The inmates in private prisons have already lost their freedom as a consequence of their criminal actions; therefore, the objective of private prisons should not subject the inmates to further suffering but rather establish effective approaches towards their rehabilitation.

Though both private and public prisons have access to money, the amount of costs for the rehabilitation purposes vary from state to state depending on the budgetary allocations and availability of others sources of funds (Featherman et al., 2001). In some cases, private investors incur the costs of building the prison facilities and rent them out for the correction purposes; nonetheless, these prisons are easily filled due to the challenges facing the justice system and high incarceration rates including those of the minor offenders. The key issues that emerge in the privately run prisons concerns the accountability, oversight, and management of these prisons. Since private prisons are expected to rehabilitate the prisoners, they should be held accountable with the outcomes of their rehabilitation programs (Gaes et al., 2004). In addition, a state or federal government oversight body should be able to monitor and assess the programs, which have been implemented, in order to determine their authenticity, reliability and effectiveness in deriving the expected results.

Drug Abuse and Mental Health

Drug abuse and mental health are on the list of factors that have been attributed to causing criminal behavior and a high quantity of offenders. Since the criminal justice system is responsible for the development and implementation of the rehabilitation programs, it offers not succeeded in achieving this goal especially in the public prisons. The inadequate resources allocation to public prisons makes it problematic for the prison management to implement the comprehensive drug abuse rehabilitation programs. In addition, in the case of some inmates, mental health problems have contributed to their criminal behavior. It is the duty of the justice system to ensure that such inmates are comprehensively rehabilitated before being released to the public (Blakely, 2007). Nonetheless, it rarely occurs since the rehabilitation programs are a subject to various limitations including inadequate finances and lack of humanpower.

Meanwhile, a number of private prisons have partnered with various drug rehabilitation centers and mental illness institutions. This strategy has enabled the private prisons to provide holistic rehabilitation of the inmates with the drug abuse issues or mental health problems. Unlike public prisons that require numerous bureaucracies, private prisons are concerned with the operation costs and potential returns (Blakely, 2007). Since the inmate rehabilitation costs are compensated by the state and federal government, private prisons ensure that all issues of rehabilitation are addressed.

A number of rehabilitative programs for the inmates with the substance abuse have been implemented in public prisons; nonetheless, they are incapable of offering personalized rehabilitation to the inmates. Essentially, these rehabilitation programs take the form of group therapies where in actuality the inmates are treated as a group while neglecting the person issues that have motivated the drug abuse or development of the mental illness. Since such treatment is largely ineffective, once the inmates are released, they have a higher chance of abusing substances and committing crimes again in order to satisfy their dependence on drugs.

Meanwhile, rehabilitation programs of behavioral modification that integrate the community participation are often less effective because of the failed support systems and inadequate humanpower for the coordination of the behavior reinforcement process. Though the community-based organizations have support systems that offer guidance and counseling, follow-ups by the prisons psychotherapists is essential in order to ensure comprehensive behavior modification (Featherman et al., 2001). Nonetheless, prison staff-inmate ratio is dramatically high; consequently, once a prisoner leaves the prison facility, the next contact with the prison therapist would only occur if he or she re-offend and is sentenced again. These issues are not limited to public prisons but are applicable to private prisons, which give attention to reducing the costs and increasing the revenues.

Conclusion

It is evident that the accessibility or unavailability of rehabilitation programs in prisons or lack thereof contributes to the recidivism rates in both private and public prisons. The high recidivism rates have led to a significant escalation in the number of prisoners that caused it to be problematic for the public facilities to manage the prison populations effectively. Therefore, the establishment of private prisons was necessary to aid in the management and rehabilitation of criminals. Nonetheless, the recidivism rates have continued to increase though they vary depending on the effectiveness of the implemented rehabilitation programs in addressing individual issues that encourage the inmates to re-offend.

Significant differences emerge in the management, nature, and scope of rehabilitation programs in both public and private prisons; nonetheless, the expected outcomes are similar in both types of prisons. It is evident that significant reforms are needed to ensure that the inmates are comprehensively rehabilitated and the recidivism rates are reduced dramatically.

  • Strugling with your essay?
  • Ask professionals to help you!
You can on this or any other topic at 123HelpMe.org. Don’t waste your time, order now!

Order Essay using this Title Plagiarism Free Prices From only 12,99$/page

John Hick is considered to function as most influential advocate of pluralistic perspective in relation to the multitude of world religion traditions. In his book Disputed Questions in Theology and the Philosophy of Religion John Hick composed: “this suggests that each concrete historical divine personality – Jahweh, the Father, the Allah – is a joint product of the universal divine presence and a particular historically formed mode of constructive religious imagination” (Hick 159). Dalai Lama can be considered by many individuals to be of pluralistic believes. Nonetheless, in this paper it’ll be further proved that while his tolerance towards other religions is absolutely sincere, he is still prioritizing the Buddhism over other religions This can be seen in many of his recent utterances, for example: “liberation in which a mind that understands the sphere of reality and annihilates all defilements in the sphere of reality is a reality that only Buddhists can accomplish” (Griffits, 169).

In the paper, Dalai Lama’s inclusivism will be critically analyzed from the vantage point of John Hick’s pluralistic hypothesis. It’ll be shown that Dalai Lama’s tolerability of other religion traditions lies not within the pluralist believes, but on the contrary – it is enacted by an ardent devotion to the teachings of his Buddhist traditions. Dalai Lama is sincerely tolerant to other religious traditions if they do not contradict his teachings.

Dalai Lama’s Teachings

Most of the Buddhism schools share a core belief that any Christian finds to be entirely incompatible with Christianity. Firstly, the doctrine of not-self (anatta) rejects the existence of an immortal soul. Secondly, Buddhist dogmas of emptiness and dependent origination contradict to one of the principal postulates of Christianity that existence is God’s free gift. Considering such fundamental contradictions, it really is obvious that Dalai Lama can not be the leading advocate of Buddhism and absolute adherent of pluralistic doctrine at the same time. Nonetheless, by prioritizing the essence of belief within the dogma, Dalai Lama is able to advocate tolerance and acceptance of other religious teaching. Therefore, Dalai Lama presents the “essence of religion” as compassion, (Dalai Lama, 13) and defines the aspiration of all religious traditions, without exclusions, as “making the mind more peaceful, disciplined, moral and ethical” (Rinchen, 101). Hence, Dalai Lama explains that the compassion is the key aspect in all religions, therefore the promotion of mentioned-above virtues is the main concern of the multiple teachings. He concludes his perspective with the words: “we must consider the question of religious diversity using this viewpoint … and when we do so, we are going to notice no contradiction” (Griffits, 167). In this relation his perspective is similar to John Hick’s conception. In one of his philosophically-religious writings Hick stated: “…while visiting synagogues or gurdwarars or temples or mosques it is obvious that substantially similar form of communication is occurring in them as in A christian church – videlicet, human beings opening their minds to a higher divine Reality” (Hicks, 2).

Client says about us

Betty, Winnipeg

Thanks for helping me with the last 2 papers. The writer you’ve assigned to me complete my paper on time and with all requirements.

Sofia, Calgary

One of the best writing services. All papers were delivered on time and were flawless.

Andy W. Alabama

I guess you know your writers are experts in Economics. They prepared a few great academic papers for me, despite the deadline was strict and the topics were really complicated. Thank you, 123helpme.org!

John, Columbus

Thanks lot, guys! Every time I order a paper, you manage to provide me with what I need and always on time.

Khalid, Dubai

All I can say is that I am very impressed. My writer completed an order on time and followed every single instruction I gave! You have done a great job guys, many thanks!

Nevertheless, Dalai Lama’s endorsement of other religious traditions emerges from his Buddhist believes. His confident opinion about essence of compassion emerges from dGe Lugs Buddhism, tradition that Dali Lama XIV belongs to. One of its principal aspects is the Bodhisattva path. According to this tradition, Bodhisattva is only for those who shares belief that “liberation, not for himself alone … but for all sentient beings” (Williams, 49). Thus, considering that  Bodhisattva is a person who can reach nirvana but does not do so out of compassion in order to save suffering beings, the Bodhisattva is a paragon of absolute compassion. Moreover, the Dalai Lama defines the main point of Buddhism as “altruism based on compassion and love” (Dalai Lama, 32). The basis of nirvana is the emptiness. Nonetheless, emptiness is an extremely complex impression for everybody to experience, so one has to be trained until the subject is ready. In the meantime, it is enough to be compassionate to have good rebirth and evolve in the spiritual direction to reach the point of highest development in enlightenment.

FREE EXTRAS:

  • FREE plagiarism report (on request)

  • FREE revision (within 2 days)

  • FREE title page

  • FREE bibliography

  • FREE outline (on request)

  • FREE e-mail delivery

  • FREE formatting

WE GUARANTEE:

  • Quality research and writing

  • 24/7/365 Live support

  • MA, BA, and PhD degree writers

  • 100% Confidentiality